Why the Senate is Wasting Time on HARP
The Senate has begun yet another round of fun-filled meetings to try and make HARP actually work for someone. Now they all admit that the reason the program has tanked so badly is because there’s no real reason for banks to work hard on it. Basically the banks have plenty of experience gaming the system and they don’t care one bit for government incentives. But unfortunately they’re still headed in the wrong direction.
Expert after “expert” has been testifying that some things would make the program work better:
- letting a new servicer compete for the refinancing or loan mod
- letting non-Freddie or Fannie backed mortgages be eligible
- dropping the loan-to-value requirements for qualifying
Now I understand that the government would be interested in changing the rules of a publicly embarassing program to try to improve things but it doesn’t seem to me that any of these suggestions addresses the real issue. In a nutshell:
If it’s not worth it for a bank to particpate in the program, then what good will it do to allow more banks in? Now you’ve just got more banks who are eligible but don’t want in.
And make more loans eligible? I believe those loans would be known as the “riskier” loans which could set the whole recovery back if they default again.
So what’s this really going to accomplish? How is this going to finally convince banks to make a solid effort at renegotiating bad loans? I’m pretty sure it won’t, but let me know what you think.
|
Subscribe and Get Cory Boatright's $297.00 Short Sale Course for FREE:
Simply Claim Your Subscription Now to: "Your Must Read Daily News Blog" - FREE!
|
|
|
We hate spam just as much as you
|
Facebook comments:
-
Oversoght401
-
Marie
-
Ed Fulmer “THE LOAN MOD GUY”
